"Keep falsehood and lies far from me"
(Prov 30:8)
One reason I have such an aversion to politicians is that they rarely, if ever, admit when they are wrong about anything. Often, it's the opposite: they will obfuscate, deflect, gaslight, or simply doubledown rather than admit fault. Truly loathsome behavior that is all too common.But that's the game, and, as Omar Little from The Wire famously said, "the game is the game." And the game is only as good as its rules.
On the flipside, for those who are wrong on a matter, even when they were well intentioned but have been proven to be incorrect on a matter and have the humility to admit it...that's admirable.
I've seen this in the liturgical world. Old-school theologians like Dr. Janet Smith and Dr. Scott Hahn--people of formidable intellect, good will, and integrity--who had built their careers on a post-conciliar foundation, have begun attending the Latin Mass and have shifted gears on the "reform of the reform." Part of this "Emmaus moment" in light of new "data" (or "fruit", if you want to speak theologically) that may not have been available twenty years ago when the New Mass was the only item on the menu for them. On the flipside, you have popesplaining sites like Where Peter Is and those who will seemingly go to their grave defending the Council doubling down with shoddy attempts to prop it up.
In the scientific world, Dr. John Campbell is one of those people willing to pivot in light of new evidence. A retired British Nurse Educator who holds a PhD in Nursing, he has been posting videos on his Youtube channel that took an evidence-based approach to the COVID pandemic for the past couple years. Like a good evidence-based educator, he tries to disseminate data for the everyday person in as unbiased a matter as possible. I don't know anything about him personally, and have only viewed a few of this videos over past two years when they pop up in my Youtube feed, but I get the impression he is someone trying to use his educational knowledge for the benefit of others, with good intentions.
While Dr. Campbell was an initial proponent of COVID19 vaccination, and used the supporting data at the time to try to interpret transmission and spread of the virus, in his latest video he admitted, "I feel naive for not questioning them (the medical establishment) more. If science isn't about truth, it's about diddly squat."
He mentions that what he previously discounted (those who were labeled as "conspiracy theorists") now seems to have merit in light of the evidence, and that he felt let down by the peer-reviewed literature and somewhat "sickened" when realizing that the trust he had placed in the medical establishment and the scientific community was misplaced."I conveyed to you at the time information [on viral origins] I was getting from the scientific literature. And it turns out now that this is not as analytical as it would like to be. And I'd like to apologize for getting it wrong." Keep in mind this is just an ordinary, unfunded retired PhD doing this because he wants to know the truth about this virus. But I think he is now realizing, like many of us are, that the truth of the matter goes much deeper and darker than we initially thought.
I'm consistently late to the party, and usually wake up to the truth of things at least ten steps behind most of those I associate with. I think this is in part because I surround myself with good, astute, and honest people (who, nonetheless, are flawed and have blinds spots like anyone else). COVID was no exception in this case. And so, if you'll allow me the liberty, I'd like to take a cue from Dr. Campbell and clarify a few things on that matter that I've written on this blog, and attempt to make amends as needed. There are some things I stand by, and some that, in light of conscience and new "evidence", I would like to concede.
First, a bit of background: in 2020, my father in law was suffering from kidney failure and on dialysis, with my wife (who is an ER nurse working part time) as his main caregiver. When the vaccine was rolled out, we felt we had sufficient reasons to consider it given her father and that she herself was working on the COVID ward during the height of the pandemic. I wrestled with the issue, having reservations about its novelty but also knowing that we were not sensitive to vaccines (vaccine injury) or opposed to vaccination in general. Theologically, my views alligned most with that of philosopher Edward Feser: I felt vaccine mandates were unjust, unwaranted, and immoral, but that one could in good conscience take the vaccine if they desired to. This is because that authority to determine what is moral rests with the Magisterium, and She has already spoken in her rightful authority. I openly opposed any purports to the contrary, even by high-profile and zealous clergy, that one was culpable of sin for vaccinating. That judgment is not theirs to make. I stand by that.
On other matters, such as masking, I was somewhat neutral. Did they help 'slow the spread'? Sure, then go ahead and wear a mask. What if they didn't? Then don't wear one. Of course I had many friends who dug their heels in when it came to mandatory masking in hospitals or schools, and refused to ever don one. I took the 1 Cor 8 approach. I wasn't pro-mask or anti-mask, pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine; what I was against was Catholics conflating these things with a Catholic moral identity. I.e., if you chose to wear a mask or get "jabbed," you were less of a Catholic; or that by not wearing a mask or not getting vaccinated you were more of a Catholic, more virtuous. In my mind, these were ancillary and not directly moral issues, but the conflation (similar to the way we can conflate nationalism with moral virtue) was all around me. I stand by that.
As mandates loomed larger, I felt a degree of shame that I was "off the hook" in choosing to vaccinate while many of my friends were being treated like social and professional lepers for holding their ground (though to note, neither my wife nor I have gotten any boosters since our initial shots two years ago, and we have no intention of (COVID) vaccinating our kids). I admitted in "Nowhere Near the Man I Thought I Was" that,
"I know for a lot of guys I know, they will be facing some hard decisions of being put to their own personal test with regards to vaccine mandates and their jobs in the ensuing months. Though I'm reticent to attach an objective religious or spiritual dimension to these decisions myself, for the individuals facing these difficult situations in conscience, that may be the case for them. They may find themselves saying "I will never get the jab" and staring down the barrel of a proverbial gun as a result. They will either have to face the consequences of these decisions, or perhaps be delivered from them. [When Fr. Walter Ciszek was broken by the KGB, he recalled]:
'I had asked for God’s help but had really believed in my ability to avoid evil and to meet every challenge. . . . I had been thanking God all the while that I was not like the rest of men. . . . I had relied almost completely on myself in this most critical test—and I had failed.'
"Scorned by everyone, despised by the people.All who see me mock me;they hurl insults, shaking their heads."(Ps 22:6-7)
I'm reminded of a Chesterton quote, " Truth can understand error, but error can't understand truth."
ReplyDeleteWe are all blessed to have a God who loves us despite our foibles and forgives us despite our unworthiness, Paul. Who are we to do less for each other?
Obstinance and willful ignorance are not just obstacles to our relationship with God and each other, they are a break with reality itself. We were given a conscience which, when well formed, warns us when something isn't right. Those of us who have been around for many decades may have cumulative doses of this sense of caution! Perhaps to the unconscious and inexperienced this appears as a knee-jerk tendency to mistrust and question authority. When it is just pattern recognition and observational learning over time, hopefully, informed by the spiritual gifts of knowledge and understanding.
I enjoy your writing. Although, I have only attended one Latin Mass in my life, the attraction is certainly understandable. As with faith and reason, tradition and charity are not mutually exclusive.
Indeed. Catholicism is a both/and religion. I will probably go to my grave with the words on my lips..."Tradition and Charity....Tradition and Charity..."
Deletehttps://fatherofthefamily.blogspot.com/2019/02/tradition-and-charity-face-of-renewal.html
A humble and honest reflection Paul. Your decision to vaccinate while opposing mandates was hardly an extreme position to begin with, but nonetheless good on you for discerning that a lie was perpetrated. Having known a young man who faced that barrel of the gun, chose to vaccinate to save his livelihood, and then unfortunately succumbed to its effects leaving his wife a widow, and 3 young children without their father; I have have a firm belief that those who insistently violated the rights of others to push what, at the time, may or may not have been a solution to the virus are culpable for the deaths of many.
ReplyDeleteOur governments, employers, and churches failed us. Only Christ never fails us. May we all learn to rely and trust on Him more than we ever have before.
My condolences. A guy in my men's group shared last week that his cousin died suddenly. Autopsy revealed it was a blood clot/heart inflammation. Was otherwise healthy. I don't want to make inferences as there could have been other factors at play, but it was a little startling that an otherwise healthy twenty something year old male athlete said he wasn't feeling well, took a bath, and died. We know not the day nor the hour.
DeleteI'm so sorry to hear. Prayers!!
DeleteMr. Campbell is an incredible guy. I’m new to the healthcare field but immediately felt betrayed when the informed consent we had just been taught about, and the right to refuse to participate in experimental treatments we’re doing clearly being violated. As a New Yorker I was appalled to see that employers in completely healthcare abandoned their employees. I still haven’t read of one administrator who refused to take part in railroading over such critical rights of their very dedicated employees. I still can’t understand it.
ReplyDeleteI thought doctors were smart people. I thought they were able to think independently of the pharmaceutical companies. I was wrong.
It’s good to see independent thinkers like Mr. Campbell still exist, but they’re so few and far between that my opinion of the healthcare industry might never recover.